Category: (Book)
53 new, starting at $5.99
66 used, starting at $3.99
Deeply DisturbingReviewed by Oliver, 2009-12-30
For most of human history, "more" and "better" have been pretty
much the same when it comes to the things we want. Even today, a
very large number of people live in poverty, and their main
priority is more -- more food, more clothing, more medical care,
more things. For them, "more" would still be "better."
But, for many of us, we have long ago passed the point where "more"
is the same as "better." Every study that has looked at the
correlation between wealth and happiness finds the same thing. Up
to a certain point, more money make people happier. After a certain
point, however, more money stops making us happier. Many of us are
long past that point. McKibben starts with this observation, but
then he moves further.
According to McKibben, our wealthy modern lifestyle is actually
starting to make us less happy. We are social creatures, and living
alone in massive houses, traveling in separate cars and the other
things money tends to buy these days tend to isolate us from other
people. This makes us less happy, in the end, not more.
And, finally, our lifestyle is less and less sustainable. Our food
supply, for example, is highly dependent on cheap oil. While this
has worked for a while, it cannot work forever. The demand for oil
-- and other limited resources -- will grow spectacularly as some
of those in poverty start to adopt some of our way of life. And
that is so, even if population stops growing.
I found this book deeply disturbing, but I think McKibben is right
about the problems he identifies. McKibben, however, is not so
pessimistic. He thinks there are solutions that will allow us to
live even happier lives by consuming less, not more. I sincerely
hope that he is right, and that more people at least listen to what
he has to say.
an inspiring and insightful bookReviewed by colleen, 2009-12-23
This book is both interesting and enjoyable. In questioning a fundamental premise of our economy and modern society- that perpetual growth is good, desirable, and necessary- McKibben aims high. While one can't help but feel that the cat is out of the bag on this, and may never go back in, McKibben does an admirable job of highlighting the potential power of a slow, gradual shift away from the growth paradigm. He inspires while he educates, and ultimately leaves the reader feeling more empowered by the relevance of his or her own choices than overwhelmed by the impossibility of change.
Preservation of Built Environment re: Deep EconomyReviewed by Gabriel Orgrease, 2009-10-20
When I read this book I kept reading passages that made me desire
to buy more copies and send to specific of my friends as McKibben
brings up so many issues that I have heard expressed regarding the
need for a sustainable human built-environment, as well as
sustaining the resource of traditional trades.
Preservation of old buildings, and the people who practice the
craft of historic preservation, is not solely about a
near-religious fixation on ancestor worship. It is also about not
discarding the embedded energy and resource of the existing built
environment, and a conscientious understanding of how most
optimally to preserve that previously expended use of energy
resources, and it is this perspective that the practitioners of
traditional trades embody in a collective knowledge. To bring these
people together to share in their knowledge is to build a
sustainable community toward a durable future.
You can paint it GREEN if you so desire, but it is so much more
than choice of a color pallet.
"Consider the most influential new program on television in the
last decade, Survivor, which ushered in the reality show craze.
Along with its uncountable offspring, it operates on the premise
that the goal is to end up alone on the island, to manipulate and
scheme until everyone else goes away and leaves you by yourself
with your money"
And then we have the father of balloon boy.
Can one say that Richard Heene and his family is not living out the
American dream, or soon to be nightmare, in a sort of modern
morality play of Everyman as reinforced by our mass-news
media?
I have been building a UFO out of cast iron for many years now...
on a test flight of an early prototype it sunk off the south shore
of Long Island. Possibly I should have called the Coast Guard? Or
possibly the answer to capture maximum broad-band exposure is more
gas and we purchase more better duct tape?
After many years of working in the construction industry I am often
struck, and a bit outraged, at the prevailing public opinion that
the low bidder on a project, particularly one paid for by taxes, is
the least cost and the most efficient. On the surface it makes
sense that we would want to pay less for more, or for just enough,
but once the public spotlight on a project is gone, once a project
goes into contract there are a whole host of "hidden" costs. These
are costs that are in the interest of various players, particularly
the ones who receive the windfall, to want to keep hidden. The name
of the game is to bid low, which assures getting the project, then
fight for change orders on every single discrepancy that can be
fought over. It makes for a cantankerous work environment.
Contractors who master the low-bid game also master the change
order process. I say this as the largest change order I was ever
involved in manipulating, from the contractor side, was $2.5M and
it had more to do with bureaucratic incompetence than it had to do
with necessity. Give it a few years later and the entire project
would likely be done over again at an even higher cost. There are
techniques of manipulation and negotiation that one learns as in
any profession.
None of this low-bid outrage has much to do with Bill McKibben's
book, least ways not much on the surface. This book sat on the
corner of my work desk for more than a year before I finally picked
it up. In part my slowness in taking it on had to do with the
recession, having to work hard enough already to stay solvent and
not wanting to focus on those problems, and a reluctance to maybe
look at what is hidden beneath our current economic trends. There
is one thing that comes out to me very strongly in the current
economy, and that is that healthy community, connections,
relationships, networking is vital to our personal survival. That
is a bit of what McKibben talks about, the relationship of
hyper-individualism, the uninhibited pursuit of number-one as
opposed to the common good, and posits this social relationship
against a backdrop of a closed-earth system with a limitation on
progressive growth, and a limitation on the resources of energy,
and a strain on the natural environment that human life itself is
dependent upon.
Something that I picked up on in New Orleans post-Katrina is that
the historic structures that survived tended to be built not only
in survivable areas, but with local materials (cypress for example,
plaster made with burnt oyster shells for another) that were
understood by the local building culture to be appropriate, but
also that the local building culture had been influenced by
centuries of French experience in Equatorial and tropic climates.
And yet, post-Katrina one of the problems encountered was the
tendency of sheetrock to get black mold (unlike with plaster, and
who knows how much of the sheetrock came from China and may contain
poisons?), or the replacement of exterior doors or windows with the
latest mass-manufactured big-box substitute. McKibben in one
passage talks about local forest harvests and what some may call
"alternative" building technologies that re-jigger the mass
production economics in the building industry (think home building
industry, and was it not the home building industry, mortgages etc.
that fueled the last economic bubble?) to increase local labor
(decentralized, potentially in work teams, as in communal and/or
barter exchange) and in the end come out not only less expensive in
the long-range (avoidance of long-term debt and usury) and often
with materials that can be replenished within one human's
lifetime.
Regardless what one believes about climate change it is fairly
obvious that humans are running out of resources as populations
increase, and as emerging 'growth' populations take on a rapidly
expanding conversion of non-renewable energy resources -- but what
is not so easily noticed is the hidden costs of our state of mind,
of the ferocity of our individualism, our demand that an individual
has a right to rise to the top "by their own efforts".
Unfortunately nobody rises by their own efforts, they rise by the
efforts of the community that selects and supports them to rise.
One can bend the language to create a myth of self-reliant
individualism, but it remains just that, a myth.
One of the things that I hear, and feel, is that a long-term
sustainable economic recovery cannot be obtained if we continue to
push toward "progress" in the same manner as got us to where we are
now, and that a future economy will need to be different, will need
to be more communal... and I mean this in the sense that not every
home needs to be a McMansion, and not every McMansion needs three
cars and a speed boat too large to trailer behind their SUV.
McKibben provides a host of examples and contemplation on the
hidden costs and the need for sustainable, local, community based
economic models. What I come away with is looking at the immediate
lives around me, my own included, and a desire to figure out how to
make sensible adjustments toward a sustainable business model and
life.
VisionaryReviewed by Amber Kelley, 2009-10-19
Let me start by saying that I'm not an environmentalist. I believe
that this world is here for our enjoyment. That being said I was
transfixed by Bill McKibbens vision in this book. He says what I
have always believed - the best life is one derived locally: it
helps not only the environment but enriches our social and
emotional connectedness as well. You can't build a daily
relationship with a farmer on the other side of the country but you
can do so with someone in your community. The farmer 2000 miles
away doesn't know or care when you get laid off or sick but the one
next door might cut you a deal in hard times. Additionally, you
don't even know if the guy way out there has a family but the one
next door might have a kid who could use your kids hand me downs.
This sort of thinking seems to me to be the basis for Deep
Economy.
McKibben's work is both bleakly terrifying and hopeful at the same
time. The juxtaposition of the modern view of successful economy
against the rich community found in the 'third world' shows just
how diverse McKibben's experiences are. He shows us time and again
that more is not necessarily better. In the highly literate and
well educated yet financially poor city of Kerala we see that a
great community does not require high finance - just the dedication
of the populous. In the seemingly lifeless trade city of Yiwu
inhabited by millions of products but few true souls we are given a
window into the emptiness of American consumerism punctuated by
sales slogans in broken English.
Anyone willing to crack this book open will be rewarded with a
renewed vision. We each have the power to affect our own community
by participating in a local lifestyle which will have the bonus
effect of reducing our footprint on the world. In short - why buy
fruit from 2000 miles away when you can find it free (or cheap) in
your own back yard, or perhaps your neighbors?
What a nice, surprising read!Reviewed by mikeandleslie, 2009-09-29
I had no idea what to expect going into this book, and I must say
that I feel all the wiser for reading it. McKibben gives a
wonderfully, refreshing alternative to globalization than fellow
writer, Thomas Friedman, offers in The World is Flat: instead of
pushing for greater innovation and being ok to the sound of
globalization's inevitability, McKibben makes a prophetic call for
a return to localization and community for the sake of the future
of our world and for the sake of our personal happiness. Armed with
stories about the growing farmer's markets phenomena, community
radio, urban gardens and the 180 degree turn Cuba made in
reinventing itself as a farming country (to name a few), McKibben
provides us with story after story of what localization could look
like in the 21st century without sounding like he wants us to sell
our houses and join the Amish.
While not a left-leaning, Green Californian, I found his reasoning
quite compelling on why I should buy local and begin to start
asking stewardship questions like, "at what greater cost (to the
earth or to exploited people, etc.) am I getting this lobster from
the restaurant, this tomato from Safeway, or this book from
Wal-mart?" And so by asking a whole new set of questions, McKibben
offers a consumeristic America a wonderful gift: the call to begin
thinking interdependently and to begin asking if MORE really does
mean BETTER?
So whether you're left, right, or just a hanging chad, this book
will make you think about what makes you happy and how you fit into
the whole of humanity.